Lal babu priyadarshi vs amritpal singh
TīmeklisLAL BABU PRIYADARSHI v. AMRITPAL SINGH, C.A. No.-002138-002138 / 2006, TīmeklisIs likely to cause confusion or deception or is scandalous, obscene or blasphemous. In Lal Babu Priyadarshi v Amritpal Singh (Civil Appeal No. 2138 of 2006, decided on 27 October 2015), the Supreme Court held that it is not permissible under the Trade Marks Act to register the name of a holy book as a trade mark.
Lal babu priyadarshi vs amritpal singh
Did you know?
TīmeklisLal Babu Priyadarshi v. Amritpal Singh 2015 (12) SCALE 76 Brief Facts: An application for registration of trademark “RAMAYAN” with the device of crown in … Tīmeklis1460123673-LAL BABU PRIYADARSHI Vs. AMRITPAL SINGH.pdf ... Sign in
Tīmeklis2015. gada 1. dec. · In the case of Lal Babu Priyadarshi vs. Amritpal Singh[1], the Supreme Court has considered the question of registration of names of holy books … TīmeklisLAL BABU PRIYADARSHI Vs. AMRITPAL SINGH. LAWS(SC)-2015-10-75 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. Decided on October 27,2015 LAL BABU PRIYADARSHI …
Tīmeklis11 In Lal Babu Priyadarshi v. Amritpal Singh reported in AIR 2016 SC 461, the Supreme Court refused registration of the mark 'Ramayan' holding that the appellant in that case had not acquired a "reputation of user" of the mark and further that there were more than 20 traders in the market using that mark. Tīmeklis2004. gada 6. maijs · He relies on the decision of Glaxo India Limited v. CCE, Kanpur [ (Tri.) = 1995 (8) RLT 1 (CEGAT-A)]. He...free to purchases above a particular quantity. ... Lal Babu Priyadarshi v. Amritpal Singh . 4. Court: Supreme Court Of India. Date: Oct 27, 2015. Cited By: 3. Coram: 2 ...—(a) the shape of goods which results from …
Tīmeklis2015. gada 12. dec. · In a recent judgment titled as “Lal Babu Priyadarshi Vs. Amritpal Singh”, the Supreme Court was posed with a legal question as to whether any …
Tīmeklis2024. gada 11. marts · Also in the case of Lal Babu Priyadarshi vs Amritpal Singh, the Supreme Court, clearly said that no one could claim trademark over Gods/Goddesses/Deities or religious books like the Holy Quran, Holy Bible, Guru Granth Sahib, Ramayana, etc. over goods or services.In this case the plaintiff applied for a … raymond sherman co conshohocken paTīmeklis(a) One Shri Lal Babu Priyadarshi-the appellant herein, trading as M/s. Om Perfumery, Bakerganj, Daldali Road, Patna made an application to the Registrar of Trade Marks to register a trade mark by name “RAMAYAN” with the device of crown in class 3 in respect of incense sticks (agarbattis, dhoops) and perfumeries etc. simplify 4 over 12Tīmeklis2015. gada 27. okt. · 2. Brief facts : (a) One Shri Lal Babu Priyadarshi-the appellant herein, trading as M/s Om Perfumery, Bakerganj, Daldali Road, Patna made an application to the Registrar of Trade Marks to register a trade mark by name "RAMAYAN" with the device of crown in class 3 in respect of incense sticks … raymond sherman lincoln ontarioTīmeklis2024. gada 18. maijs · Amritpal Singh v. Lal Babu Priyadarshi And Anr. 19. Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board. Date: Jan 10, 2005. Cited By: 0. Coram: 2 ...‘RAMAYAN’ is not a distinctive mark and is devoid of any ... raymond sherman mdTīmeklis2005. gada 1. okt. · Amritpal Singh . R.K. Agrawal, J.—. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 10-1-2005 passed by the Intellectual Property Appellate … simplify 4r+2s+r+8sTīmeklisThe Appellant, Lal Babu, had applied for registration of a trade mark for his product, incense sticks, with the name 'RAMAYAN' and an image of a crown. The respondent, … raymond sherryTīmeklis1997. gada 5. dec. · Registrar of Trade Marks v.Ashok Chandra Rakhit Ltd. AIR 1955 SC 558 (SCR at p...1. Leave granted. 2. The trial court granted an interlocutory injunction in favour of the appellants in a suit filed by it for perpetual injunction to restrain the respondent...-defendant from using the expression “Super Cup” for marketing the … raymond she\u0027s the one